|Causes, Effects, and Positivism
Phenomena and Noumena
A Flawed Approach
Return to:Title Page
Ardue Site Plan
See also:Chapter VI Investigating Higher Dimensions
Chapter XII Phenomena
Chapter I Knowledge
The Economy of Life
Light on the Path
In textbooks on the history of literature we are told that in its time, Goethe's Werther provoked an epidemic of suicides. What did provoke these suicides?
Let us imagine that some "scientist" appears who, being interested in the fact of the increase of suicides, begins to study the first edition of Werther according to the method of exact, positive science. He weighs the book, measures it by the most precise instruments, notes the number of its pages, makes a chemical analysis of the paper and the ink, counts the number of lines on every page, the number of letters, and even how many times the letter A is repeated, how many times the letter B, how many times the question mark is used, and so on. In other words he does everything that the pious Mohammedan performs with relation to the Koran of Mohammed, and on the basis of his investigations writes a treatise on the relation of the letter A of the German alphabet to suicide.
Let us imagine another scientist who studies the history of painting and, deciding to put it on a scientific basis, starts a lengthy series of analyses of the pigment used in the pictures of famous painters in order to discover the causes of the different impressions produced upon the beholder by different pictures.
Imagine a savage studying a watch. Let us admit that he is a wise and crafty savage. He takes the watch apart and counts all its wheels and screws, counts the number of teeth in each gear, finds out its size and thickness. The only thing he does not know is what all these things are for. He does not know that the hand completes the circuit of the dial in half of twenty-four hours, i.e., that it is possible to tell time by means of a watch.
All these are examples of "positivism".
We are too familiar with "positivistic" methods, and so fail to realise that they end in absurdities and that if we are seeking to explain the meaning of anything, they do not lead to the goal at all.
The difficulty is that for the explanation of meaning, positivism is no use. For it, Nature is a closed book of which it studies only the appearance.
In the matter of the study of the operations of Nature, the positive methods have achieved much, as is proven by the innumerable successes of modern technics, including the conquest of the air. But everything in the world has its own definite sphere of action. Positivism is very good when it seeks an answer to the question of how something operates under given conditions; but when it makes the attempt to get outside of its definite conditions (space, time, causation), or presumes to affirm that nothing exists outside of these given conditions, then it is transcending its own proper sphere.
It is true that the more serious positive thinkers deny the possibility of including in "positive investigation" the questions of why and what for. But as a matter of fact the positive standpoint is not the only possible one. The usual mistake of positivism consists in its not seeing anything except itself it either considers everything as possible to it, or considers as generally impossible much that is entirely possible, but not for positive enquiry.
However, humanity will never cease to search for answers to the questions why and wherefore.
But if a man knows of the existence of the contents of the book the noumenon of life if he knows that a mysterious meaning is hidden under visible phenomena, there is the possibility that in the long run he will discover the contents.
For success in this it is necessary to grasp the idea of the inner contents, i.e., the meaning of the thing in itself.
The scientist who discovers little tablets with hieroglyphics or wedge-shaped inscriptions in an unknown language deciphers and reads them after great labour. In order to accomplish this, he needs only one thing: he must know that these little signs represent an inscription. So long as he regards them simply as an ornament, as the outside embellishment of little tablets, or as an accidental tracing without meaning up to that time their meaning and significance will be absolutely closed to him. But let him only assume the existence of that meaning, and the possibility of its comprehension opens up.
No secret cipher exists which cannot be solved without the aid of any key. But it is necessary to know that it is a cipher. This is the first and necessary condition. Lacking this, it is impossible to accomplish anything.
But there is no greater error than to regard the world as divided into phenomena and noumena to conceive of phenomena and noumena apart from one another and susceptible of being known separately. This is philosophical illiteracy, which shows itself most clearly in the dualistic spiritistic theories. The division into phenomena and noumena exists only in our minds. The "phenomenal world" is simply our incorrect perception of the world.
As Carl DuPrel has said, "The world beyond is this world, only perceived strangely". It would be more accurate to say that this world is the world beyond perceived strangely.
Kant's idea is quite correct: the study of the phenomenal side of the world will not bring us any nearer to the understanding of "things-in-themselves". The "thing-in-itself" is the thing as it exists independently of us. The "phenomenon of the thing" is the thing in whatever semblance we perceive it.
The example of a book in the hands of an illiterate savage shows us quite clearly that not knowing about the existence of the noumenon of a thing (the contents of the book in this case) ensures that it shall not manifest itself in phenomena. On the other hand, knowledge of the existence of the noumenon is sufficient to make its discovery possible with the aid of the very phenomena which, without the knowledge of the noumenon, would be perfectly useless.
Just as it is impossible for a savage to attain to an understanding of the nature of a watch by a study of its phenomenal side wheels, teeth, gears) so also for the positivistic scientist, studying the external, manifesting, side of life, its secret raison d'κtre and the aim of separate manifestations will be forever hidden.
To the savage the watch will be an extremely interesting, complicated, but entirely useless toy. Somewhat after this manner a man appears to the scientist-materialist a mechanism infinitely more complex, but equally unknown as regards the purpose for which it exists and the manner of its creation.
We pictured to ourselves [see Complexity Ed.] how incomprehensible the functions of a candle and of a coin would be for a plane-man, studying two similar circles on his plane. In like manner the functions of a man are incomprehensible to the scientist studying him as a mechanism. The reason for this is clear. It is because the coin and the candle are not two similar circles, but two different objects, having entirely different meanings and uses in that world which is relatively higher than the plane and man is not a mechanism, but something having an aim and a meaning in the world relatively higher than the visible one.
The functions of a candle and of a coin in our world are for the imaginary plane-man an inaccessible noumenon. It is evident that the phenomenon of a circle cannot give any understanding of the function of a candle and its difference from the function of a coin. But two-dimensional knowledge exists not only on the plane. Materialistic thought tries to apply it to real life.
A curious result follows, the true meaning of which is, unhappily, incomprehensible to many people. One of such applications is "the economic man", a two-dimensional and flat being moving in two directions those of production and consumption i.e., living upon the plane of production-consumption. How is it possible to imagine man in general as such an obviously artificial being? And how is it possible to understand the laws of the life of man, with his complex spiritual aspirations and his great impulse to know, to understand everything around him and within himself, merely by studying the imaginary laws of an imaginary being upon an imaginary plane? Only the inventors of this theory possess the secret of the answer to this question. But the economic theory of human life attracts men as do all simple theories giving a short answer to a series of complicated questions. And we are ourselves too entangled in materialistic theories to see anything beyond them. [Compare The Economy of Life. Ed.]
"Positivism" affirms that the phenomena of life and psychic phenomena are simply the functions of physical phenomena; that without physical phenomena the phenomena of life, thought, and emotion cannot exist, and that they represent only certain complex combinations of the foregoing; and furthermore that all these three kinds of phenomena are one and the same thing in substance and the higher, i.e., the phenomena of life and of consciousness, are only different expressions of the lower, i.e., of one and the same physico-mechanical or electromagnetic energy.
But to all this it is possible to answer one thing. If it were true it would have been proven long ago. Nothing is easier than to prove the energetic hypothesis of life and the psyche. Just create life and thought by the mechanical method. Materialism and energetics are those "obvious" theories which cannot be true without proofs, because they cannot not have proofs if they contain even a little grain of truth.
But there are no proofs at the disposal of these theories; quite the reverse: the infinitely greater potential of the phenomena of life and the psyche compared with physical phenomena assures us of the exact opposite.
The simple fact shown above [see Comparative Potency Ed.] of the enormous liberating, unbinding force of psychic phenomena is sufficient to establish quite really and firmly the problem of the world of the hidden. And the world of the hidden cannot be the world of unconscious mechanical motion, or unconscious development of electromagnetic forces.
The positivistic theory admits the possibility of explaining the higher by the lower, the invisible through the visible. But it was shown at the very beginning [see Definition and Proof. Ed.] that this is the explanation of one unknown by another unknown.
There is still less justification for explaining the known through the unknown. Yet that "lower" (matter, motion) through which the positivists strive to explain the "higher" (life, thought) is itself unknown. Consequently it is impossible to explain and define anything else in terms of it, while the higher, i.e., the thought, is our sole known: it is this alone that we do know, that we are conscious of in ourselves, that we can neither mistake nor doubt. And if thought can evoke or unbind physical energy, and motion can never create or unbind thought (no thought has ever arisen from a revolving wheel) so of course we shall strive to define, not the higher in terms of the lower, but the lower in terms of the higher. If the invisible, like the contents of a book or the purpose of a watch, by itself defines the visible, so also shall we endeavour to understand not the visible, but the invisible.
Starting from a false assumption concerning the mechanicality of the noumenal side of Nature, positive science, upon which the view of the world of the intelligent majority of contemporary humanity is founded, makes still another mistake in regard to cause and effect, or the law of functions that is, it mistakes what is cause, and what is effect.
But this could be true only if there were no phenomena of life or of thought in the world, or if the phenomena of life and thought were really derivatives from physical phenomena, and did not possess infinitely greater latent force than they. Then only should we have the right to consider the chains of phenomena in their physical or visible sequence alone, as positivistic philosophy does. But taking into consideration the phenomena of life and thought, we shall inevitably recognise that the chain of phenomena often translates itself from a purely physical to a biological sequence i.e., one in which there is much of the hidden and invisible to us or to a psychical sequence where there is even more of the hidden. On the other hand, during reverse translations from biological and psychical spheres into physical sequences, actions proceed often, if not always, from regions which are hidden from us, i.e., the cause of the visible is in the invisible.
In consequence of this we must admit that it is impossible to consider the chains of sequences in the world of physical phenomena only. When such a sequence touches the life of a man or that of a human society, we perceive clearly that it escapes from the "physical sphere" and returns into it. Regarding the matter from this standpoint we see that, just as in the life of one man and in the life of a society there are many streams, at times appearing on the surface and spouting up in boisterous torrents, and at other times disappearing deep underground, hidden from view, but only waiting for their moment to appear again above the surface, so do we observe how these chains shift from one order of phenomena to another without a break.
We observe how the phenomena of consciousness thoughts, feelings, desires are accompanied by physiological phenomena creating them, perhaps and inaugurate a series of purely physical phenomena; and we see how physical phenomena, becoming the objects of sensations of sight, hearing, touch, smell, and the like, induce physiological phenomena, and then psychological. But looking at life from that side, we see only physical phenomena, and having assured ourselves that it is the only reality, we may not notice the others at all.
Herein appears the enormous power of suggestion in current ideas. To a sincere positivist, any metaphysical argument proving the unreality of matter or energy seems sophistry. It strikes him as a thing unnecessary, disagreeable, hindering a logical train of thought, an assault without aim or meaning on that which in his opinion is firmly established, alone immutable, lying at the foundation of everything. He vexedly fans away from himself all "idealistic" or "mystical" theories as he would a buzzing mosquito.
But the fact is that thought and energy are different in substance and cannot be one and the same thing because they are different sides of one and the same thing. For if we open the cranium of a living man in order to observe all the vibrations of the cells of the grey matter of the brain, and all the quivering white fibres, in spite of everything there will be merely motion, i.e., the manifestation of energy, and thought will remain somewhere beyond the limits of investigation, retreating like a shadow at every approach. When the "positivist" begins to realise this, he feels that the ground is quaking underneath his feet, and that by his method he will never approach to the thought. Then he sees clearly the necessity for a new method. As soon as he begins to think about it he begins quite unexpectedly to notice things around him which he did not see before. His eyes begin to open to that which he did not wish to see before. The walls which he had erected around himself begin to crumble, and behind the falling walls infinite horizons of possible knowledge, hitherto undreamed of, unroll before him.
Thereupon he completely alters his view of everything surrounding him. He understands that the visible is produced by the invisible and that without understanding the invisible it is impossible to understand the visible. His "positivism" begins to totter and, if he is a man with a bold thought, then in some splendid moment he will perceive those things which he was wont to regard as real and true to be unreal and false, and those things he formerly regarded as false to be real and true.
First of all he will see that manifested physical phenomena often hide themselves, like a stream that has gone underground. Yet they do not disappear altogether, but continue to exist in latent form in some minds, in someone's memory, in the words or books of someone, just as the future harvest is latent in the seeds. And thereafter they again burst into light; out of this latent state they come into an apparent one, making a roar, reverberation, motion.
I find an admirable description of this idea in the chapter on "Karma" in Light on the Path by Mabel Collins [see Book 2 Ed.]:
Consider with me that the individual existence is a rope which stretches from the infinite to the infinite, and has no end and no commencement, neither is it capable of being broken. This rope is formed of innumerable fine threads which, lying closely together, form its thickness. These threads are colourless, are perfect in their qualities of straightness, strength, and alignment. This rope, passing as it does through all places, suffers strange accidents. Very often a thread is caught and becomes attached, or perhaps is only violently pulled away from its even way. Then for a great time it is disordered and it disorders the whole. Sometimes one is stained with dirt or with colour, and not only does the stain run on further than the spot of contact, but it discolours others of the threads. And remember that the threads are living are like electric wires; more, are like quivering nerves. How far, then, must the stain, the misalignment, be communicated! But eventually the long strands, the living threads which in their unbroken continuity form the individual, pass out of the shadow into the shine. Then the threads are no longer colourless, but golden; once more they lie aligned. Once more harmony is established between them; and from that harmony within, the greater harmony is perceived.
This illustration presents but a small portion a single side, of the truth; it is less than a fragment. Yet, dwell on it; by its aid you may be led to perceive more. What is necessary first to understand is not that the future is arbitrarily formed by any separate acts of the present, but that the whole of the future is in unbroken continuity with the present, as the present is with the past. On one plane, from one point of view, the illustration of the rope is correct.
This illustration presents but a small portion a single side, of the truth; it is less than a fragment. Yet, dwell on it; by its aid you may be led to perceive more. What is necessary first to understand is not that the future is arbitrarily formed by any separate acts of the present, but that the whole of the future is in unbroken continuity with the present, as the present is with the past. On one plane, from one point of view, the illustration of the rope is correct. Light on the Path.
These passages show us that the idea of karma, developed in remote antiquity by Hindu philosophy, embodies the idea of the unbroken consecutiveness of phenomena. Each phenomenon, no matter how insignificant it seems, is a link in an infinite and unbroken chain, extending from the past into the future, passing from one sphere into another, sometimes manifesting as physical phenomena, sometimes hiding in the phenomena of consciousness.
If we regard karma from the standpoint of our theory of time and space of many dimensions, then the connection between distant events will cease to be wonderful and incomprehensible. If events most distant from one another in relation to time touch one another in the fourth dimension, this means that they are proceeding simultaneously as cause and effect, and the walls dividing them are just an illusion which our weak intellect cannot conquer. Things are united, not by time, but by an inner connection, an inner correlation. And time cannot separate those things which are inwardly near, following one from another. Certain other properties of these things force us to think of them as being separated by the ocean of time. But we know that this ocean does not exist in reality and we begin to understand how and why the events of one millennium can directly influence the events of another millennium.
The hidden activity of events becomes comprehensible to us. We understand that the events must become hidden in order to preserve for us the illusion of time.
We know this know that the events of today were the ideas and feelings of yesterday and that the events of tomorrow are lying in someone's irritation, in someone's hunger, in someone's suffering, and possibly still more in someone's imagination, in someone's fantasy, in someone's dreams.
We know all this; yet nevertheless our "positive" science obstinately seeks to establish correlations between visible phenomena only, i.e., to regard each visible phenomenon as the effect only of some other visible physical phenomenon.
This tendency to regard everything upon one plane, the unwillingness to recognise anything outside of that plane, horribly narrows our view of life, prevents our grasping it in its entirety and taken in conjunction with the materialistic attempts to account for the higher as a function of the lower, appears as the principal impediment to the development of our knowledge, the chief cause of our dissatisfaction with science, the complaints about the bankruptcy of science, and its actual bankruptcy in many of its relations.
The dissatisfaction with science is perfectly well grounded, and the complaints about its insolvency are entirely just, because science has really entered a cul de sac out of which there is no escape, and official recognition of the fact that the direction it has taken is entirely the wrong one is only a question of time.
Consider the street of a great city in all its details. An enormous diversity of facts will result. But how much is hidden underneath these facts which it is impossible to see at all! What desires, passions, thoughts, greed, covetousness; how much of suffering both petty and great; how much of deceit, falsity; how much of lying; how many invisible threads sympathies, antipathies, interests bind this street with the entire world, with all the past and with all the future. If we realise this imaginatively, then it will become clear that it is impossible to study the street by that which is visible alone. It is necessary to plunge into the depths. The complex and enormous phenomena of the street will not reveal its infinite noumenon, which is bound up both with eternity and with time, with the past and with the future, and with the entire world.
Therefore we have a full right to regard the visible phenomenal world as a section of some other infinitely more complex world, manifesting itself at a given moment in the first one.
And this world of noumena is infinite and incomprehensible for us, just as the three-dimensional world, in all its manifoldness of function, is incomprehensible to the two-dimensional being. The nearest approach to "truth" which is possible for a man is contained in the saying: everything has an infinite variety of meanings, and to know them all is impossible. In other words, "truth", as we understand it, i.e., as the finite definition, is possible only in a finite series of phenomena. In an infinite series it will certainly become its own opposite.
Hegel has given utterance to this last thought: "Every idea, extended into infinity, becomes its own opposite."
In this change of meaning is contained the cause of the incomprehensibility to man of the noumenal world. The substance of a thing, i.e., the thing-in-itself, contains an infinite quantity of meanings and functions of something which it is impossible to grasp with our mind. In addition to this it involves a change of meaning of one and the same thing. In one meaning it represents an enormous whole, including within itself a great number of things; in another meaning it is an insignificant part of a great whole. Our mind cannot bind all this into one; therefore, the substance of a thing recedes from us according to the measure of our knowledge, just as a shadow flees before us.
Light on the Path says: "You will enter the light, but you will never touch the flame."
This means that all knowledge is relative. We can never grasp all the meanings of any one thing, because in order to grasp them all, it is necessary for us to grasp the whole world, with all the variety of meanings contained in it.
The principal difference between the phenomenal and noumenal aspects of the world is contained in the fact that the first one is always limited, always finite; it comprises only those properties of a given thing which we can generally know as phenomena; the second, or noumenal aspect, is always unlimited, always infinite. And we can never say where the hidden functions and the hidden meanings of a given thing end. Properly speaking, they end nowhere. They may vary infinitely, i.e. may seem various, ever new from some new standpoint, but they cannot utterly vanish any more than they can cease, come to an end.
All that is highest to which we shall come in the understanding of the meaning, the significance, of the soul of any phenomenon, will again have another meaning from another, still higher, standpoint, in still broader generalisation and there is no end to it! In this is the majesty and the horror of infinity.
Now "over there" does not mean some other place, but a new method of knowledge, a new understanding. And should we regard chains of things not as isolated, but bound together with inter-crossing chains of things and events, we would begin to regard them not from over here but from over there.